Physicist: High energy charged particles rain in on the Earth from all directions, most of them produced by the Sun. If it weren’t for the Earth’s magnetic field we would be subject to bursts of radiation on the ground that would be, at the very least, unhealthy. The more serious, long term impact would be the erosion of the atmosphere. Charged particles carry far more kinetic energy than massless particles (light), so when they strike air molecules they can kick them hard enough to eject them into space. This may have already happened on Mars, which shows evidence of having once had a magnetic field and a complex atmosphere, and now has neither (Mars’ atmosphere is ~1% as dense as ours).
Rule #1 for magnetic fields is the “right hand rule”: point your fingers in the direction a charged particle is moving, curl your fingers in the direction of the magnetic field, and your thumb will point in the direction the particle will turn. The component of the velocity that points along the field is ignored (you don’t have to curl your fingers in the direction they’re already pointing), and the force is proportional to the speed of the particle and the strength of the magnetic field.
This works for positively charged particles (e.g., protons). If you’re wondering about negatively charged particles (electrons), then just reverse the direction you got. Or use your left hand. If the magnetic field stays the same, then eventually the ion will be pulled in a complete circle.
As it happens, the Earth has a magnetic field and the Sun fires charged particles at us (as well as every other direction) in the form of “solar wind”, so the right hand rule can explain most of what we see. The Earth’s magnetic field points from south to north through the Earth’s core, then curves around and points from north to south on Earth’s surface and out into space. So the positive particles flying at us from the Sun are pushed west and the negative particles are pushed east (right hand rule).
Since the Earth’s field is stronger closer to the Earth, the closer a particle is, the faster it will turn. So an incoming particle’s path bends near the Earth, and straightens out far away. That’s a surprisingly good way to get a particle’s trajectory to turn just enough to take it back into the weaker regions of the field, where the trajectory straightens out and takes it back into space. The Earth’s field is stronger or weaker in different areas, and the incoming charged particles have a wide range of energies, so a small fraction do make it to the atmosphere where they collide with air. Only astronauts need to worry about getting hit directly by particles in the solar wind; the rest of us get shrapnel from those high energy interactions in the upper atmosphere.
If a charge moves in the direction of a magnetic field, not across it, then it’s not pushed around at all. Around the magnetic north and south poles the magnetic field points directly into the ground, so in those areas particles from space are free to rain in. In fact, they have trouble not coming straight down. The result is described by most modern scientists as “pretty”.
The Earth’s magnetic field does more than just deflect ions or direct them to the poles. When a charge accelerates it radiates light, and turning a corner is just acceleration in a new direction. This “braking radiation” slows the charge that creates it (that’s a big part of why the aurora is inspiring as opposed to sterilizing). If an ion slows down enough it won’t escape back into space and it won’t hit the Earth. Instead it gets stuck moving in big loops, following the right hand rule all the way, thousands of miles above us (with the exception of our Antarctic readers). This phenomena is a “magnetic bottle”, which traps the moving charged particles inside of it. The doughnut-shaped bottles around Earth are the Van Allen radiation belts. Ions build up there over time (they fall out eventually) and still move very fast, making it a dangerous place for delicate electronics and doubly delicate astronauts.
Magnetic bottles, by the way, are the only known way to contain anti-matter. If you just keep anti-matter in a mason jar, you run the risk that it will touch the mason jar’s regular matter and annihilate. But ions contained in a magnetic bottle never touch anything. If that ion happens to be anti-matter: no problem. It turns out that the Van Allen radiation belts are lousy with anti-matter, most of it produced in those high-energy collisions in the upper atmosphere (it’s basically a particle accelerator up there). That anti-matter isn’t dangerous or anything. When an individual, ultra-fast particle of radiation hits you it doesn’t make much of a difference if it’s made of anti-matter or not.
And there isn’t much of it; about 160 nanograms, which (combined with 160 nanograms of ordinary matter) yields about the same amount of energy as 7kg of TNT. You wouldn’t want to run into it all in one place, but still: not a big worry.
In a totally unrelated opinion, this picture beautifully sums up the scientific process: build a thing, see what it does, tell folk about it. Maybe give it some style (time permitting).
The right hand picture is from here.
Really cool! Thanks for this thorough post!
Does the magnetic repulsion of solar ions slow the earth’s rotation at all?
Or is any deceleration due to this resistance imposed only on the iron convectional flows within the earth?
Where do the solar ionized particles come from? Are they ejected from the fused elements within the sun, or generated from some other source along the trajectory of solar photons?
Thanks!
Don’t the magnetic field lines go from the geographic south pole to the geographic north pole (the field lines outside of the earths interior?) I thought this was because the geographic north pole is the magnetic south pole. Maybe you said it right but i just got it confused
Pingback: Earth’s Magnetic Field Weakening More Quickly
what is the polarity of the galaxy/ doe sit differ from that of the central anomaly?
depleted uranium is lead carbon has a specific decay rate what if dead photons make up d\”Dark Matter” ?
Pingback: Proxima B! | Ask a Mathematician / Ask a Physicist
what are the things that are colourful in the sky?
Northern lights, or aurora borealis.
Could the deflected protons somehow bombarded Mars in the distant past.
I agree with bo jangles about earth’s magnetic field direction.
Article is also confusing because your right hand rule is our left hand rule in UK to (we do it differently)