Category Archives: — By the Physicist

Q: Why is the speed of light finite?

Physicist: That is such a hard question.  Holy crap. If you kept the laws of the universe the way they are, but ramped up the speed of light to infinity you’d end up with a surprising array of effects.  Newton … Continue reading

Posted in -- By the Physicist, Philosophical, Physics, Relativity | 25 Comments

Q: Why is the speed of light the fastest speed? Why is light so special?

Physicist: The best way to think about it is; there is a speed (C) that is the fastest speed and, by the way, light goes that fast. There’s nothing special about light, it’s just a useful way of describing C … Continue reading

Posted in -- By the Physicist, Physics, Relativity | 54 Comments

Q: Will we ever overcome the Heisenberg uncertainty principle?

Physicist: Nopers! The Heisenberg uncertainty principle, while normally presented in physics circles, is actually a mathematical absolute.  So overcoming the uncertainty principle is exactly as hard as overcoming that whole “1+1=2” thing. The uncertainty principle (the “position/momentum uncertainty principle”) is … Continue reading

Posted in -- By the Physicist, Equations, Math, Physics, Probability, Quantum Theory | 24 Comments

Q: If gravity is the reaction matter has on space, in that it warps space, why do physicist’s look for a gravity particle? Wouldn’t gravity be just a bi-product of what matter does to space?

Physicist: Isn’t that weird? The name “quantum mechanics” comes from the fact that, at its most base, quantum mechanics requires all particles and energies to come in discrete (one might say “quantized”) packets.  At some point a bunch of physicists … Continue reading

Posted in -- By the Physicist, Particle Physics, Physics, Quantum Theory | 12 Comments

Q: Is it possible to beat the laws of physics?

Physicist: No… But to be fair, when a physical law is beaten it stops being a law.

Posted in -- By the Physicist, Paranoia, Philosophical, Skepticism | 8 Comments

Q: What’s the chance of getting a run of K or more successes (heads) in a row in N Bernoulli trials (coin flips)? Why use approximations when the exact answer is known?

The original question was: Recently I’ve come across a task to calculate the probability that a run of at least K successes occurs in a series of N (K≤N) Bernoulli trials (weighted coin flips), i.e. “what’s the probability that in … Continue reading

Posted in -- By the Mathematician, -- By the Physicist, Combinatorics, Equations, Math, Probability | 54 Comments